What Kind of Prayer Was the Earliest Church Dedicated To? (Why Greek Matters Part 17)


“They were  continually devoting themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship,to the breaking of bread and to prayer.” Acts 2:42 NASB

Acts 2:42 is a commonly used text to talk about the community dynamics and priorities of the Church at its absolute earliest moments, often as an ideal to be reached or restored. Here we pay particular attention to the final of the four aspects mentioned: what the NASB and NIV translate “prayer.” The difficulty here is two-fold: (1) the word “prayer” in Greek is actually plural and (2) it is prefixed by the definite article, which would commonly be translated as “the.”

So a more literal translation would be that “they were continually devoting themselves…to the prayers.” Of all the modern translations, only the NRSV and ESV capture both of these aspects.

What are the implications for these translation choices? We can start by easily saying the verse is most likely not referring to prayer in general, as in, the early Christians were simply devoted to the concept, or even the practice, of prayer. This verse is telling us more than that. In all likelihood, it is referring to a collection of set “prayers” (the plural) that were well known (“the” prayers). The word “the,” in Greek, as well as in English, can oftenfunction to indicate something that is well known to people. For example, if I tell someone, “go get the shirts,” or “go get the car,” it is unnecessary for me to specify “the shirts we are wearing for the wedding tonight” or “our car,” because everyone involved in the communication knows what “the one(s)” is/are.1

That “the prayers” the early Christians were devoted to were set liturgical prayers is likely for at least three reasons:

1) liturgical prayers were common in Judaism, in both temple and synagogue worship

2) connection to the temple is made in Acts 2:46 and 3:1, where such liturgical prayers were made

3) In Luke 11:2-4 Jesus teaches his disciples a set prayer for them to use.2

I often hear reference to “getting back to the early church.” This often involves an idealistic notion of (1) worship with little to no set structure (2) completely bypassing the intervening 1900+ years of Church history and making a straight connect to the “early church.” In the process, we wind up baptizing as the “restoration of early church practice,” many styles, techniques, and modalities that undeniably bear the marks of our present culture and would seem utterly foreign to early Christians. What if the prayer and worship the Early Church was devoted to was a continuation of the liturgical prayers of the temple and synagogue, and later Christian adaptations of them? Is it possible that earlyChristian practice had a greater continuity with the Jewish liturgical tradition than contemporary free-church or charismatic traditions? Everything we know about Christian worship from the 2nd century indicates that this was likely the case. So could this mean that “restoring the practice of the early church” might look more like the churches who have maintained and developed that continuity of liturgical prayer and worship?


Picture is from a third century catacomb

  1. Daniel Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), 225. 

  2. Darrell L. Bock, Acts (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2007), 151-2. 

This entry was posted in Acts, Bible, Prayer and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to What Kind of Prayer Was the Earliest Church Dedicated To? (Why Greek Matters Part 17)

  1. Steve says:

    If “the prayers” were actually a set of early-church liturgical prayers which were meant to be collectively recited, I would expect them to be written down for distribution just like the epistles, so that all of the churches in various cities could all be on the same page, so to speak. I haven’t heard of any such collections of prayers from that era.

Leave a Reply